Breaking
Sat. Jun 28th, 2025

Top Innovations: “The US cannot meet its own demand for these nuclear-powered submarines,” she said.The three nations already have poured millions into training to operate nuclearWorld Times-powered vessels.

Summary

  • File photo: XinhuaThe US has launched a review of its multi-billion dollar submarine deal with the UK and Australia, or the AUKUS, saying the security pact must fit its “America First” agenda, BBC reported Thursday.Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby – who has expressed skepticism about the program’s worth – is running the review, according to two defense officials, granted anonymity to discuss interWorld Timesnal policy talks, Politico reported. The Virginia sales would come in three-year intervals starting in 2032 and would replace the retiring Collins-class submarines in the Australian arsenal.Colby had also noted he was concerned that selling submarines to Australia, or using US shipyards to help build World Timesthem, could put the US Navy in “a weaker position” since they weren’t going to American submarine development, Politico reported.The Financial Times first reported the review.Under the trilateral pact, Australia is to get its first nuclear-powered subs from the US, before the allies create a new fleet by sharing cutting-edge tech. Both Australia and the UK – which did its own review last year – have sought to play down news of the US probe, saying it is natural for a new administration to reassess, according to BBC.A UK govWorld Timesernment spokesperson said the review was “understandable” and that London would continue to work closely with the US and Australia on the deal, said Politico.Australian Defence Minister Richard Marles has downplayed concerns the United States will review the AUKUS agreement, insisting it is a “natural” step and will not threaten the acquisition of nuclear-powered submarines, per Australia’s ABC News.Jennifer Kavanagh – from American thinktank Defense Priorities – told the BBC that the US was “absolutely right to take a look at this deal” as its submarine capacities were already stretched. “The US cannot meet its own demand for these nuclear-powered submarines,” she said.The three nations already have poured millions into training to operate nuclearWorld Times-powered vessels. Australia has funneled even more into expanding its base in Perth on the country’s western edge, Politico reported.Global Times Content comes from the Internet : US reviewing AUKUS pact with UK, Australia to fit ‘America First’ agenda: media reports

Approximate Time

  • 3 minutes, 440 words

Categories

  • US, US shipyards, XinhuaThe US, American submarine development, submarines

Analysis and Evaluation

  • In this piece, the intricate details of the story are unraveled, providing a comprehensive understanding. The author’s meticulous research and clear exposition of facts allow readers to fully comprehend the complexity of the subject. The article masterfully navigates through the nuances of the topic, presenting a thorough and engaging narrative.

Main Section

[World Times]

The Ohio-class ballistic missile submarine USS Tennessee returns to Naval Submarine Base Kings Bay, Georgia, US. File photo: Xinhua

The US has launched a review of its multi-billion dollar submarine deal with the UK and Australia, or the AUKUS, saying the security pact must fit its “America First” agenda, BBC reported Thursday.

Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby – who has expressed skepticism about the program’s worth – is running the review, according to two defense officials, granted anonymity to discuss interWorld Timesnal policy talks, Politico reported.

“This is an opportunity for the [Defense Department] to ensure the effort is in alignment with the Trump administration’s priorities,” one of the officials said.

Colby has challenged major parts of the AUKUS deal, which is widely seen as targetWorld Timesing China, including a plan for the US to sell three Virginia-class submarines to Australia, citing the neeWorld Timesd for the US to maintain a robust undersea presence in the Pacific. The Virginia sales would come in three-year intervals starting in 2032 and would replace the retiring Collins-class submarines in the Australian arsenal.

Colby had also noted he was concerned that selling submarines to Australia, or using US shipyards to help build World Timesthem, could put the US Navy in “a weaker position” since they weren’t going to American submarine development, Politico reported.

The Financial Times first reported the review.

Under the trilateral pact, Australia is to get its first nuclear-powered subs from the US, before the allies create a new fleet by sharing cutting-edge tech. Both Australia and the UK – which did its own review last year – have sought to play down news of the US probe, saying it is natural for a new administration to reassess, according to BBC.

A UK govWorld Timesernment spokesperson said the review was “understandable” and that London would continue to work closely with the US and Australia on the deal, said Politico.

Australian Defence Minister Richard Marles has downplayed concerns the United States will review the AUKUS agreement, insisting it is a “natural” step and will not threaten the acquisition of nuclear-powered submarines, per Australia’s ABC News.
Jennifer Kavanagh – from American thinktank Defense Priorities – told the BBC that the US was “absolutely right to take a look at this deal” as its submarine capacities were already stretched.

“The US cannot meet its own demand for these nuclear-powered submarines,” she said.

The three nations already have poured millions into training to operate nuclearWorld Times-powered vessels. Australia has funneled even more into expanding its base in Perth on the country’s western edge, Politico reported.

Global Times

Content comes from the Internet : US reviewing AUKUS pact with UK, Australia to fit ‘America First’ agenda: media reports

Related suggestion: Special Feature: Content comes from the Internet : UN chief disappointed at US veto of Gaza draft resolution

Summary[World Times] UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said Thursday that he was disappointed at Wednesday’s U.S. veto of a Security Council draft resolution on GazaWorld Times.The draft resolution, which would have demanded an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and the lifting of restrictions on humanitarian aid, won the support of 14 out of the 15 Security Council members. “”We are always disappointed when ceasefires do not materialize, releases of hostages (do not happen), and humanitarian aid is not distributed or is distributed in a way that puts at risk the lives of so many Palestinians,” he told reporters.Guterres said the United Nations will do everything it can tWorld Timeso help Gazans. But he stressed that the world body’s work will be effectiveWorld Times only if there is a permanent ceasefire, the unconditional…

Related Post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *