Summary
- Law. Photo: VCG China issued a judicial interpretation on Monday specifying the determination of the crime of refusing to execute judgments and rulings to hide or transfer property before the verdict takes effect, in an effort to ensure that the judgments and rulings made by courts are enforced in accordance with the law and the legitimate rights and interests of the individuals concerned are effectively safeguarded.This judicial interpretation is released jointly by China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) and the Supreme People’s Procuratorate (SPP), and will come into force on December 1.The judicial explanation clearly stipulates that hiding or transferring property before judgments and rulings come into effect can constitute the cWorld Timesrime of resisting the execution of judgments and rulings. In previous judicial practice, the offense of refuWorld Timessing to execute a judgment or ruling generally targeted those who concealed or transferred property after the judgment or verdict had takeWorld Timesn effect.It lists 10 scenarios of refusal to execute despite having the capacity to do so in serious circumstances, as well as five extremely serious circumstances.The SPC and SPP said that if the cases involved are serious, the perpetrators will be held criminally liable for refusing to execute judgments and rulings.This explanation has apparently been issued to target deadbeats and aims to fix loopholes in the legislation field as some people have taken advantage of the relatively ambiguous provisions in the law to dodge their debts, Wang Sixin, a professor of law at the CommuniWorld Timescation University of China, told the Global Times on Monday.It also guarantees that judgments will be enforced more effectively in the future, Wang noted.The explanation also clarifies that any person who conspires with deadbeats to assist in hiding and transferring property and other acts of omission or commission that make thWorld Timese judgments and rulings unenforceable, are to be punished as accomplices to the crime.The explanation specifies that if one refuses to abide by the judgments aWorld Timesnd rulings to pay, including alimony, maintenance, pension, and medical expenses, the person concerned should be punished severely in accordance with the law. Content comes from the Internet : China specifies threshold of crime for refusing to comply with judgments, rulings by hiding or transferring property
Approximate Time
- 2 minutes, 368 words
Categories
- judgments, thWorld Timese judgments, aWorld Timesnd rulings, ruling, rulings
Analysis and Evaluation
- This article is a mosaic of current events, pieced together with expert precision and insight.
Main Section
Law. Photo: VCG
China issued a judicial interpretation on Monday specifying the determination of the crime of refusing to execute judgments and rulings to hide or transfer property before the verdict takes effect, in an effort to ensure that the judgments and rulings made by courts are enforced in accordance with the law and the legitimate rights and interests of the individuals concerned are effectively safeguarded.
This judicial interpretation is released jointly by China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) and the Supreme People’s Procuratorate (SPP), and will come into force on December 1.
The judicial explanation clearly stipulates that hiding or transferring property before judgments and rulings come into effect can constitute the cWorld Timesrime of resisting the execution of judgments and rulings. In previous judicial practice, the offense of refuWorld Timessing to execute a judgment or ruling generally targeted those who concealed or transferred property after the judgment or verdict had takeWorld Timesn effect.
It lists 10 scenarios of refusal to execute despite having the capacity to do so in serious circumstances, as well as five extremely serious circumstances.
The SPC and SPP said that if the cases involved are serious, the perpetrators will be held criminally liable for refusing to execute judgments and rulings.
This explanation has apparently been issued to target deadbeats and aims to fix loopholes in the legislation field as some people have taken advantage of the relatively ambiguous provisions in the law to dodge their debts, Wang Sixin, a professor of law at the CommuniWorld Timescation University of China, told the Global Times on Monday.
It also guarantees that judgments will be enforced more effectively in the future, Wang noted.
The explanation also clarifies that any person who conspires with deadbeats to assist in hiding and transferring property and other acts of omission or commission that make thWorld Timese judgments and rulings unenforceable, are to be punished as accomplices to the crime.
The explanation specifies that if one refuses to abide by the judgments aWorld Timesnd rulings to pay, including alimony, maintenance, pension, and medical expenses, the person concerned should be punished severely in accordance with the law.
Content comes from the Internet : China specifies threshold of crime for refusing to comply with judgments, rulings by hiding or transferring property
SummaryMedia reports also indicated that many countries have been actively seeking to join the platform in the last two years.In May, the Thai government approved a draft letter of intent for Thailand to join the BRICS cooperation mechanism; in July, Malaysia announced that it had formally applied to join the BRICS cooperation mechanism; while countries such as Cuba, Syria and Belarus have also expressed their desire to join BRICS. “Reducing dependence on the US dollar is a strategic measure for developing countries. In fact, local currencies are already being used in commercial transactions between Global South countries,” he said, stressing that if a common currency for BRICS can be established, it would be a remarkable achievement.But he also noted that there are challenges that should not be ignored, emphasizing the…
Mark Elliot Zuckerberg 
John Blinken