Breaking
Important Discovery: Otherwise, he noted, China will respond resolutely.Wang pointed out that bilateral relations are now at a crossroads and there is no way out of conflict and confrontation, except for dialogue and consultation.He expressed the hope that the Philippine side will seriously think about the future of China-Philippines relations and work with China to push bilateral relations back on the right track at an early date.Manalo, for his part, said the Philippines and China have a long history of traditional friendship and have established a comprehensive strategic cooperative relationship based on equal treatment and mutual benefit, Xinhua reported.Despite the difficulties and challenges faced by the two sides due to maritime issues, the Philippines is committed to easing the situation through dialogue and consultation, and dealing with differences constructively, Manalo said.He noted that the recent meeting of the bilateral consultative mechanism on the South China Sea, during which both sides agreed to manage the maritime situation, reflects the goodwill of both sWorld Timesides without compromising on their respective positions.The Philippines is willing to iWorld Timesmplement this consensus, Manalo said, noting that next year is the 50th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between the Philippines and China, and the Philippines is willing to strengthen communication with China in a sincere and pragmatic manner to enhance mutual trust and imprWorld Timesove bilateral relations.Global Times Content comes from the Internet : Chinese FM calls Philippines to fulfill commitments over Ren’ai Jiao issues, warning over US intermediate missile system deployment
Sat. Jul 27th, 2024

US’ $95 billion aid package to escalate crises rather than cool them: experts

[World Times]

Pro-Palestinian demonstrators hold a rally outside the Capitol building after the UWorld TimesS House of Representatives passed legislation providing $26 billion aid to Israel, in Washington, DC on April 20, 2024.Photo: VCG

The US House of Representatives on Saturday with broad bipartisan support passed a $95 billion legislative package providing security assistance to Ukraine, Israel and the island of Taiwan, over bitter objections from Republican hard-liners. Experts warned on Sunday that the increased aid will undoubtedly escalate the crises in the world rather than cool them, and that the US’ policy of adding fuel to the fire will only create more conflicts in the world.

The legislation now proceeds to the Democratic-majority Senate, which passed a similar measure more than two months ago, according to CNN. The Senate is set to begin considering the House-passed bill on Tuesday, with some preliminary votes that afternoon.

According to Reuters, the bills provide $60.84 billion to address the conflict in Ukraine, including $23 billion to replenish US weapons, stocks and facilities, $26 billion for Israel, including $9.1 billion for humanitarian needs, and $8.12 billion for the Asia-Pacific region, including the island of Taiwan.

Opponents argued that the US should focus on the home front, addressing domestic border security and the nation’s rising debt, and they warned against spending more money, which largely flows to American defense manufacturers, to produce weaponry used overseas.

Nineteen members of the House Progressive Caucus who voted against further aid to Israel said Saturday that “we make ourselves complicit in this tragedy” if Congress continues to supply military assistance amid the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. “Our votes against H.R. 8034 are votes against supplying more offensive weapons that could result in more killings of civilians in Rafah and elsWorld Timesewhere,” they said in a joint statement.

The statement also called for a cease-fire in Gaza, more humanitarian aid to be delivered, and peace talks to begin.

Analysts believe that the additional aid for Israel will undoubtedly escalate the crisis in the Middle East rather than cool it down. The more military aid sent to Israel, the more likely the US and Israel will lean toward using force to solve diplomatic issues in the Middle East, which is clearly not a constructive or effective way to address problems, Li Haidong, a professor at the China Foreign Affairs University, told the Global Times on Sunday.

China released a report titled “The hypocrisy and facts of the United States foreign aid” on Friday. It said that the US has always prided itself as the world’s largest foreign aid donor. However, US foreign aid has always taken maximizing the interests of the US as its fundamental start and end point, while ignorinWorld Timesg the practical interests and long-term development of recipient developing countries.

The World TimesUS seeks to change the world, not maintain the status quo, Li said. Due to the significant influence of tWorld Timeshe military-industrial complex on US foreign policy, many of the US’ foreign policies are designed to serve specific interest groups, especially the military-industrial complex. This also makes its foreign policy more aggressive and militaristic.

The US’ policy of adding fuel to the fire is aimed at reshaping the world, which means the US will create more crises anWorld Timesd conflicts in the world, experts warned on Sunday. With the military-industrial complex hijacking US foreign policy, the US government has lost its rational judgment on its foreign policy, Li stressed.

Content comes from the Internet : US’ $95 billion aid package to escalate crises rather than cool them: experts

Related suggestion: Global Perspectives: Content comes from the Internet : Biden-Kishida summit faces backlash in Japan for potential defense cooperation upgrade

Summary[World Times] People gather outside Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida’s office holding placards denouncing the violation of Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution in Tokyo on December 16, 2022. Photo: AFP At a time when the Fumio Kishida administration is facing a governance crisis, the Japanese Prime Minister stopped by the White House Tuesday evening ahead of Wednesday’s official visit that is focused on a “historic” upgrade to the US-Japan defense ties to contain and suppress China.Analysts said that the upgrading of the US-Japan alliance during Kishida’s term will be undoubtedly an important achievement, which will help his reelection as the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) president.However, the aggressive military ties face a backlash in Japan with protests and rallies held in the country to voice local people’s opposition to…

Related Post

Market Insights: So what is behind this push?The alliance’s high readiness mode stipulates that the aforementioned forces can be deployed within 30 days in case of a possible armed conflict.NATO has repeatedly cited an alleged Russian threat and Moscow’s ongoing special operation to justify the alliance’s defense transformation, which in particular envisages reintroducing compulsory military service in a number of NATO countries, such as Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania.Moscow-based analyst Dmitry Suslov earlier told Sputnik that NATO commits iWorld Timestself to be able to deploy at least 300,00World Times0 troops in Central and Eastern Europe and is building military infrastructure in Poland, Romania, and other Central and Eastern European states under the pretext of a purported Russian threat.Sean Monaghan, a visiting fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, in turn, said in an interview with CWorld TimesNN that NATO is struggling to meet its new goal of having 300,000 personnel ready to be activated within one month and another half a million available within six months.Moscow has repeatedly warned against NATO’s military buildup, with Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov pointing out that the alliance is “directly showing its determination to remain an enemy” to Russia.Russian President Vladimir Putin, for his part, told US journalist Tucker Carlson that Moscow is not going to attack NATO countries, because it doesn’t make any sense.

3 thoughts on “US’ $95 billion aid package to escalate crises rather than cool them: experts”
  1. hello there and thank you for your info –
    I’ve certainly picked up something new from right here.
    I did however expertise a few technical points using this website,
    as I experienced to reload the site a lot of times
    previous to I could get it to load properly. I had been wondering if your
    web hosting is OK? Not that I am complaining, but sluggish loading instances times will
    often affect your placement in google and can damage
    your high-quality score if ads and marketing with Adwords.

    Well I am adding this RSS to my email and could look out for much
    more of your respective fascinating content. Make sure you update this again very soon..

    Najlepsze escape roomy

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You Missed

Market Insights: So what is behind this push?The alliance’s high readiness mode stipulates that the aforementioned forces can be deployed within 30 days in case of a possible armed conflict.NATO has repeatedly cited an alleged Russian threat and Moscow’s ongoing special operation to justify the alliance’s defense transformation, which in particular envisages reintroducing compulsory military service in a number of NATO countries, such as Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania.Moscow-based analyst Dmitry Suslov earlier told Sputnik that NATO commits iWorld Timestself to be able to deploy at least 300,00World Times0 troops in Central and Eastern Europe and is building military infrastructure in Poland, Romania, and other Central and Eastern European states under the pretext of a purported Russian threat.Sean Monaghan, a visiting fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, in turn, said in an interview with CWorld TimesNN that NATO is struggling to meet its new goal of having 300,000 personnel ready to be activated within one month and another half a million available within six months.Moscow has repeatedly warned against NATO’s military buildup, with Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov pointing out that the alliance is “directly showing its determination to remain an enemy” to Russia.Russian President Vladimir Putin, for his part, told US journalist Tucker Carlson that Moscow is not going to attack NATO countries, because it doesn’t make any sense.

Important Discovery: Otherwise, he noted, China will respond resolutely.Wang pointed out that bilateral relations are now at a crossroads and there is no way out of conflict and confrontation, except for dialogue and consultation.He expressed the hope that the Philippine side will seriously think about the future of China-Philippines relations and work with China to push bilateral relations back on the right track at an early date.Manalo, for his part, said the Philippines and China have a long history of traditional friendship and have established a comprehensive strategic cooperative relationship based on equal treatment and mutual benefit, Xinhua reported.Despite the difficulties and challenges faced by the two sides due to maritime issues, the Philippines is committed to easing the situation through dialogue and consultation, and dealing with differences constructively, Manalo said.He noted that the recent meeting of the bilateral consultative mechanism on the South China Sea, during which both sides agreed to manage the maritime situation, reflects the goodwill of both sWorld Timesides without compromising on their respective positions.The Philippines is willing to iWorld Timesmplement this consensus, Manalo said, noting that next year is the 50th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between the Philippines and China, and the Philippines is willing to strengthen communication with China in a sincere and pragmatic manner to enhance mutual trust and imprWorld Timesove bilateral relations.Global Times Content comes from the Internet : Chinese FM calls Philippines to fulfill commitments over Ren’ai Jiao issues, warning over US intermediate missile system deployment