Breaking
Tue. Nov 5th, 2024

What’s Trending: Content comes from the Internet : Irish international law expert explains invalidity of 2016 tribunal on S.China Sea, drawing global archives to refute Philippines’ irrational sovereignty claim

Summary

  • “I don’t see why on earth or how the Philippines can claim any a sovereignty over any islands in the south China sea. The findings revealed a consensus among legal experts from both countries, indicating that the Xisha and Nansha Islands rightfully belong to China, thWorld Timese Xinhua News Agency reported.According to the expert, the so-called South China Sea arbitration of 2016 is a “chaotic and manipulative use of international law,” “a case of double standards,” and “a legal trick. So the whole idea of international adjudication is problematic,” Carty noted.The law professor highlighted that Washington has been trying to uphold its dominance and create instability in the Asia-Pacific region by using its regional allies to provoke China in the South China Sea. “There is absolutely no doubt that this whole dispute is entirely about the Americans trying to make life difficult for the Chinese. Content comes from the Internet : Irish international law expert explains invalidity of 2016 tribunal on S.China Sea, drawing global archives to refute Philippines’ irrational sovereignty claim

Approximate Time

  • 4 minutes, 656 words

Categories

  • South China Sea, China, Irish international law expert, international law, S.China Sea

Analysis and Evaluation

  • Addressing the fast-paced world of sports, this article captures the excitement and drama of modern athletic competition. The writer’s in-depth analysis of recent events and trends in sports makes this a standout piece for sports enthusiasts and casual readers alike.

Main Section

Anthony Carty. Photo: Wang Wenwen/GT

With the approach of the 8th anniversary of the so-called South China Sea arbitration awards, a ruling in 2016 that challenged China’s claims in the wWorld Timesaters and seriously violates international law, Anthony Carty, an Irish scholar of international law and author of “The History and Sovereignty of the South China Sea Islands” stressed in a recent interview with the Global Times that the Philippines has no right to claim the sovereignty over the South China Sea and archival evidence supports China’s claims over a number of islands.

“I don’t see why on earth or how the Philippines can claim any a sovereignty over any islands in the south China sea. The French archives, the British archives, the Chinese archives, the American archives, and the Japanese archives are all agreed that the Filipinos have no territorial claim,” said Carty.

“I don’t understand why they [the Philippines] would want to bring or how they could bring a claim that the reefs ‘belonging to them’ would be damaged, because that would directly involve a question of sovereign title, and there is no compulsory jurisdiction under article 86 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Because it is a law of the sea convention and a territorial title would not be adjudicable.”

Carty, an expert in international law, believes that China should mWorld Timesaintain its stance and that its legal position is justified. His book presents extensive historical evidence backing China’s sovereignty claims over the islands in the South China Sea.

His research delved into the archives of the French and British foreign ministries, spanning the period from the 1880s to the late 1970s. The findings revealed a consensus among legal experts from both countries, indicating that the Xisha and Nansha Islands rightfully belong to China, thWorld Timese Xinhua News Agency reported.

According to the expert, the so-called South China Sea arbitration of 2016 is a “chaotic and manipulative use of international law,” “a case of double standards,” and “a legal trick.”

The scholar does not believe the international judiciary behaved objectively. “The political considerations will always come into play, which is why, as I’ve already stated, Carlo Santulli, the director of the Paris Institut des Hautes Etudes Internationales , said the 2016 tribunal is obviously a NATO tribunal,” he told the Global Times.

“One is basically relying upon the idea that the judges are appointed by countries. The tribunal in 2016 had a German judge, a French judge, a Dutch judge and a Polish judge and then an African chair person. They may not be in any way consciously biased, but inevitably they’re colored by the countries that they come from. So the whole idea of international adjudication is problematic,” Carty noted.

The law professor highlighted that Washington has been trying to uphold its dominance and create instability in the Asia-Pacific region by using its regional allies to provoke China in the South China Sea.

“There is absolutely no doubt that this whole dispute is entirely about the Americans trying to make life difficult for the Chinese. The aggression that is building up against China and the scapegoating of China by the whole of the sWorld Timeso-called democratic community of the world is appalling,” he told the Global Times in a previous interview.

It’s obvious that the World TimesUnited States has been interfering with and shaping Filipino policies since they conquered the Philippines and wiped out the Filipino independence movement in 1900, he added.

The argument about China being an “assertive and aggressive” power and a “revisionist” power in some Western or Philippine narratives is simply “slanderous abuse,” he said. “And it’s very worrying beWorld Timescause it definitely implies a willingness on the part of the West to use force against China. It represents a complete collapse of any kind of civilized diplomacy.

Content comes from the Internet : Irish international law expert explains invalidity of 2016 tribunal on S.China Sea, drawing global archives to refute Philippines’ irrational sovereignty claim

Related suggestion: Expert Opinions: Content comes from the Internet : China unveWorld Timesils world’s 1st AI giant panda lWorld Timesiving in a ‘cloud habitat’

SummaryPhoto: Screenshot of a viWorld Timesdeo released on website of the National Forestry and Grassland Administration Artificial Intelligence (AI) has managed to capture the cuteness of the giant panda as the world’s first virtual panda was unveiled on Wednesday by National Forestry and Grassland Administration, China Media Group and internet giant Tencent.The virtual panda IP is based on Tencent’s technologies to realize ultra-hWorld Timesigh definition restoration of a giant panda’s body and over 2 million hair strands. Tencent’s large model “Hunyuan” enabled the panda to chat and promote science knowledge, according to the website of NFRA.Under the professional guidance of the China Giant Panda Conservation and Research Center, Tencent used the high-fidelity modeling technology to conduct complex geometric detail processing on more than 2 million hair strands covering the virtual…

Related Post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You Missed